![\"May](\"https:\/\/scontent-ord5-3.xx.fbcdn.net\/v\/t39.30808-6\/625397993_1381381974001225_8544364554614198848_n.jpg?_nc_cat=110&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=127cfc&_nc_ohc=YNwlVSpX08QQ7kNvwEVqlX6&_nc_oc=Adkw_nAoFcFyeS1a5_LQgAcIvSAGP7i5haYb2GHrFnzRia04CBBQNgwBORb5Uu7OUZ0&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-ord5-3.xx&_nc_gid=ZA7O5JrhB1dkIMNzgEQrPw&oh=00_AfpGk9qOOtSBqUhgEx-Tz4jeTcMV4Ejs5HQcdz1v6-Zyog&oe=6982972E\")
<\/p>\n\n\n\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Myanmar Spring Chronicle \u2013 January 29 Scene*
(MoeMaKa) January 30, 2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In recent weeks, Philippine Foreign Affairs Secretary Theresa Lazaro<\/em>, whose country currently holds the rotating chairmanship of ASEAN\u2014the Southeast Asian bloc made up of 11 member states\u2014visited Naypyidaw in her capacity as the representative of the ASEAN chair. Her visit took place just days before the completion of the third phase of Myanmar\u2019s election, which armed resistance groups and overseas political forces opposing the military regime have widely described as a sham election.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At a time when these groups have been calling on ASEAN not to recognize the Myanmar military junta, not to allow junta representatives to attend ASEAN meetings, and not to channel ASEAN humanitarian assistance through the coup regime, the visit by the foreign minister of the ASEAN chair country has raised concerns among opposition forces.<\/p>\n\n\n\n These concerns centered on whether ASEAN might accept the results of the sham election, or whether ASEAN was moving toward recognizing an election organized and overseen by the military junta. However, in the days following her visit, the Philippine foreign minister clarified that ASEAN as a whole does not<\/em> recognize the election conducted by the military.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That said, she also noted that while ASEAN as an organization does not recognize Myanmar\u2019s election, a significant number of ASEAN member states view the election as a potential positive step toward change. Although she did not name these countries, it is widely assumed that they may include Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At a recent ASEAN foreign ministers\u2019 meeting held in the Philippines, Thailand\u2019s foreign minister, Sihasak<\/em>, stated that ASEAN needs to pursue a calibrated re-engagement with Myanmar. He argued that ASEAN should accept the post-election reality and adjust its actions to match the situation on the ground. He also emphasized that Thailand, unlike many other countries, is directly affected more severely by developments in Myanmar\u2014suggesting that Thailand\u2019s perspective may differ from that of other ASEAN members.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Thailand\u2019s position can be understood in light of ongoing realities: refugees fleeing conflict in Myanmar crossing into Thailand, daily illegal border crossings by people seeking work in Thailand or passage onward to Malaysia, and even incidents where fighting near the border has resulted in stray shells landing inside Thai territory, causing damage and injuries. These direct impacts help explain Thailand\u2019s calls for a more pragmatic approach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In fact, just weeks before the election, Thailand\u2019s foreign minister had already expressed hope that the election could serve as one step along a broader political reform pathway.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Meanwhile, Timor-Leste<\/em>, a relatively new ASEAN member, has taken a markedly different stance. After Timor-Leste\u2019s leaders met openly with the Chin Human Rights Organization (CHRO) regarding the Myanmar military\u2019s human rights violations, the Myanmar junta summoned Timor-Leste\u2019s ambassador and issued a warning. The junta accused Timor-Leste of interfering in the internal affairs of another ASEAN member state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Since late 2021, Myanmar\u2019s military has been barred from sending politically appointed representatives to ASEAN meetings\u2014a restriction that has now lasted nearly four years. This limitation has been maintained because the junta has failed to implement ASEAN\u2019s Five-Point Consensus<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n All of these positions, conditions, and stances remained in place through the election period. What remains uncertain\u2014and is now a matter of keen interest\u2014is how ASEAN\u2019s posture may shift after the election.<\/p>\n\n\n\n While some ASEAN member states sent election observation teams to Myanmar, others did not. Even in cases where no observers were dispatched, embassies operating inside Myanmar are expected to report their assessments and findings to their respective governments. As a result, ASEAN countries are already well aware of the election\u2019s lack of fairness, lack of freedom, discriminatory practices favoring military-backed political parties, and unequal treatment of other political parties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, as Myanmar\u2019s armed conflict and civil war\u2014triggered by the 2021 coup\u2014approach the five-year mark, ASEAN governments may increasingly believe that the Myanmar crisis cannot be resolved through a clear-cut victory or defeat by either side. Based on this assessment, there are growing signs that ASEAN may be preparing for increased engagement if the military regime reemerges under the appearance of an elected civilian government\u2014essentially changing its outward form while retaining its core power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n These signals suggest that, following the election, ASEAN\u2019s approach to Myanmar may evolve toward deeper engagement rather than continued isolation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Myanmar Spring Chronicle \u2013 January 29 Scene*(MoeMaKa) January 30, 2026 Myanmar\u2019s Sham Election and ASEAN\u2019s Stance In recent weeks, Philippine Foreign Affairs Secretary Theresa Lazaro, whose country currently holds the rotating chairmanship of ASEAN\u2014the Southeast Asian bloc made up of…<\/p>\n